William P. Leonard and Kim Leonard v. Larry Smith, P.E., Individually and D/B/A Larry Smith Engineering
William P. Leonard and Kim Leonard v. Larry Smith, P.E., Individually and D/B/A Larry Smith Engineering
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-014-CV
WILLIAM P. LEONARD AND KIM LEONARD APPELLANTS
V.
LARRY SMITH, P.E., INDIVIDUALLY AND APPELLEE
D/B/A LARRY SMITH ENGINEERING
----------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered the AAgreed Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice, Appellants= Prematurely Filed Appeal.@ It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 12, 2009
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.