William P. Leonard and Kim Leonard v. Larry Smith, P.E., Individually and D/B/A Larry Smith Engineering
William P. Leonard and Kim Leonard v. Larry Smith, P.E., Individually and D/B/A Larry Smith Engineering
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-014-CV
WILLIAM P. LEONARD AND KIM LEONARD APPELLANTS
V.
LARRY SMITH, P.E., INDIVIDUALLY AND APPELLEE
D/B/A LARRY SMITH ENGINEERING
----------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered the “Agreed Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice, Appellants’ Prematurely Filed Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants , for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 12, 2009
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.