in Re Richard Scheller
in Re Richard Scheller
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00188-CV
Nobell Communications, Inc., d/b/a Nobell Communications of Delaware, f/k/a Nobell Communications, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Appellant v. Andrew Heller, Harvey Ring, and Carmelo M. Gordian, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-000225, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was due on September 28, 2009. On October 28, 2009, this Court notified Appellant that its brief was overdue and that failure to file a proper motion for extension of time by November 9, 2009, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
Diane M. Henson, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: December 16, 2009
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.