Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III v. Brad Livingston, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III v. Brad Livingston, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00362-CV
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III, Appellant
v.
Brad Livingston, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-08-002020, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On September 21, 2009, we notified appellant Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III that the appellate record in this case did not appear to contain a final or otherwise appealable order. This Court's jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders signed by the trial court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, .014 (West 2008); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Sossamon's response to this notice fails to demonstrate that a final or otherwise appealable order has been signed by the trial court. Sossamon seeks to appeal from the trial court's order permitting him to take a pre-suit deposition and denying a motion for a protective order filed by the individual to be deposed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 202.1. Specifically, Sossamon wishes to appeal from the following language in the order: "However, Plaintiff [Sossamon] must follow the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, including the rules regarding costs and fees." A trial court's order stating that the applicable procedural rules shall apply to a pre-suit deposition is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014. No appealable judgment or order appears in the record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
___________________________________________
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: October 15, 2009
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.