Candice Latrice Alexander v. State
Candice Latrice Alexander v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-09-00374-CR
NO. 03-09-00375-CR
NO. 03-09-00376-CR
Candice Alexander, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 390TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOS. D-1-DC-07-302725, D-1-DC-08-300740, D-1-DC-08-300741
HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Candice Alexander seeks to appeal her convictions for criminal mischief and credit card abuse. The record reflects that after filing her notice of appeal, Alexander filed a waiver of her right to appeal in the trial court. Alexander's counsel also notified this Court of Alexander's waiver of the right to appeal. A waiver of the right to appeal that is freely and voluntarily made is binding upon the appellant. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). After such a waiver is made, the trial court's permission is required before a defendant may appeal. Id. Because the record does not reflect that Alexander obtained the trial court's permission to appeal after filing her waiver, the appeal is dismissed.
___________________________________________
Diane M. Henson, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Waldrop and Henson
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: August 21, 2009
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.