Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Mehdi Hassanali Patel v. State

Mehdi Hassanali Patel v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 21, 2009

Mehdi Hassanali Patel v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00249-CR

Mehdi Hassanali Patel, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-07-203572, HONORABLE MIKE DENTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After being notified that the reporter’s record was overdue, the court reporter advised the Court no arrangements for payment had been made. The Court notified appellant’s retained attorney, Matthew C. Nichols, that the appeal would be submitted without a reporter’s record if payment was not made. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Counsel did not respond to this notice.

Accordingly, counsel was notified that his brief was due on November 10, 2008. The brief has not been received and counsel did not respond to the Court’s overdue notice.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than February 13, 2009.

Rule 38.8(b)(3).

__________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop Abated Filed: January 21, 2009 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.