Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Michael Ugwu and Gaberlia Ugwu v. Villas at Ingram Hills Homeowners Association, Inc.

Michael Ugwu and Gaberlia Ugwu v. Villas at Ingram Hills Homeowners Association, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 21, 2009

Michael Ugwu and Gaberlia Ugwu v. Villas at Ingram Hills Homeowners Association, Inc.

Opinion



















MEMORANDUM OPINION



No. 04-09-00358-CV


Michael UGWU and Gaberlia Ugwu,

Appellants


v.


VILLAS AT INGRAM HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee


From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-13808

Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM



Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice



Delivered and Filed: October 21, 2009



DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On August 4, 2009, we ordered Appellants Michael Ugwu and Gaberlia Ugwu to provide written proof to this court on or before August 14, 2009, that either (1) the reporter's fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the reporter's fee; or (2) appellants were entitled to appeal without paying the reporter's fee. And, we ordered appellant to file written proof on or before August 14, 2009, that they had filed a designation of record with the court reporter. We noted that if appellants failed to respond within the time provided, their brief would be due within thirty days from the date of our order, and that we would only consider those issues or points raised in their brief that did not require a reporter's record for a decision.

Because appellants did not file written proof with this court as ordered, their appellants' brief was due September 3, 2009. However, neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Therefore, on September 18, 2009, we ordered appellants to file, on or before September 28, 2009, their appellants' brief and a written response reasonably explaining (1) their failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee was not significantly injured by their failure to timely file a brief. We warned that if appellants failed to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Appellants have not filed a brief or a written response as ordered. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.



PER CURIAM



Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.