Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Estate of Kenneth Lee Pearson

Estate of Kenneth Lee Pearson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 25, 2009

Estate of Kenneth Lee Pearson

Opinion

NO. 07-09-0230-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


AUGUST 25, 2009

______________________________


IN RE ESTATE OF KENNETH LEE PEARSON, DECEASED

_________________________________


FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;


NO. 28633-01-P; HONORABLE ARTHUR WARE, JUDGE

_______________________________



Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

          Appellant, Mary S. Stevens Pearson, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs related to this appeal are assessed against appellant. If dismissal will prevent appellee from seeking relief to which she would otherwise be entitled, the Court directs appellee to file a timely motion for rehearing. No motion for rehearing from appellant will be entertained.

 

 

                                                                Mackey K. Hancock

                                                                         Justice

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Appellant will be denied his right to both legally review and contest the trial proceedings which sentenced him to the maximum term of confinement, i.e., two (2) years, in a State Jail Facility.

By the amended motion, Appellant's counsel has not provided a plausible statement indicating that failure to timely file the notice of appeal was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake, or mischance. Without such explanation, we are without jurisdiction to dispose of the appeal in any manner other than by dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). See also Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). Additionally, we do not have authority to invoke Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in an effort to obtain jurisdiction of the case. We cannot create jurisdiction where none exists. Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

Consequently, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (2)



Per Curiam



Do not publish.

1. Rule 44.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires a reasonable time to correct or amend formal defects or irregularities in appellate procedure before dismissing an appeal.

2. Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2007)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.