Elida Castaneda, Ramona Castaneda, Lupe Castaneda and Arthur Castaneda v. Clark Riley
Elida Castaneda, Ramona Castaneda, Lupe Castaneda and Arthur Castaneda v. Clark Riley
Opinion
NO. 07-09-0139-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 12, 2009 ______________________________ ELIDA CASTANEDA, RAMONA CASTANEDA, LUPE CASTANEDA, AND ARTHUR CASTANEDA, APPELLANTS V. CLARK RILEY, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; NO. A35668-0710; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID, JUDGE _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants Elida Castaneda, Ramona Castaneda, Lupe Castaneda and Arthur Castaneda appealed from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Clark Riley. Appellants have filed a motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal in accordance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1. Finding the motion complies with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled, we dismiss the appeal.
Having disposed of the appeal at appellant’s request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate will issue forthwith.
James T. Campbell Justice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.