in the Interest of Sarah Jane Rideout, a Child
in the Interest of Sarah Jane Rideout, a Child
Opinion
IN THE INTEREST OF SARAH JANE RIDEOUT, A CHILD. | § | 109th District Court of Winkler County, Texas (TC # 15,590) |
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal.
Appellant filed notice of appeal on May 4, 2009 and the clerk's record was filed on June 1, 2009. Appellant's brief was therefore due to be filed on July 1, 2009. Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. On July 16, 2009, the Clerk of the Court sent a letter notifying Appellant that neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time in which to file the brief had been filed. The letter further advised Appellant of the Court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, Appellant responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been received.
This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ). We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(c).
November 24, 2009
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.