in Re: Integrated Health Services at Hanover House, Inc. A/K/A IHS of Hanover...
in Re: Integrated Health Services at Hanover House, Inc. A/K/A IHS of Hanover...
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
| IN RE: INTEGRATED HEALTH
SERVICES AT HANOVER HOUSE,
INC. A/K/A IHS OF HANOVER HOUSE,
INC. D/B/A MOUNTAIN VIEW
HEALTHCARE CENTER; IHS
ACQUISITION NO. 171, INC.; AND IHS
ACQUISITION NO. 131, INC., Relators. | § | AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS |
Relators, Integrated Health Services at Hanover House, Inc. a/k/a IHS of Hanover House, Inc. d/b/a Mountain View Healthcare Center; IHS Acquisition No. 171, Inc.; and IHS Acquisition No. 131, Inc., ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable M. Sue Kurita, Judge of the County Court at Law No. 6 of El Paso County, Texas. In order to be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relators are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
May 20, 2009
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.