Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Keyona Javon Dugar pled guilty to robbery. On June 18, 2007, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Dugar guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Dugar on community supervision for eight years, assessed a fine of $500, and ordered Dugar to pay restitution. On May 9, 2008, the State filed a motion to revoke Dugar's unadjudicated community supervision. Dugar pled "true" to several violations of the conditions of her community supervision. The trial court found that Dugar violated the conditions of her community supervision, found Dugar guilty of robbery, and assessed punishment at seven years of confinement.

Dugar's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On January 8, 2009, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and find that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. ⁽¹⁾

AFFIRMED.

__________________________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Submitted on April 17, 2009

Opinion Delivered June 10, 2009

Do not publish

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.