Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

in the Interest of M.C. and S.C.

in the Interest of M.C. and S.C.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 5, 2009

in the Interest of M.C. and S.C.

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-08-00465-CV

____________________



IN THE INTEREST OF M.C. AND S.C.




On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-06-06393 CV




MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 9, 2009, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. We also notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. The appellant, Blanca Carrillo, did not respond to the Court's notices. The appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, and there being no reasonable explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Costs are assessed against the appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_____________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice



Opinion Delivered March 5, 2009

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.