Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Jose Luis Parra-Telles v. State

Jose Luis Parra-Telles v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 25, 2009

Jose Luis Parra-Telles v. State

Opinion

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-08-00064-CR

____________________



JOSE LUIS PARRA-TELLES, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee




On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 07-07-07326 CR




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jose Luis Parra-Telles (1) entered a non-negotiated guilty plea to the third degree felony offense of driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 2003). Parra-Telles stipulated to the trial court's jurisdiction but pled untrue to the State's habitual offender enhancement allegations. The State introduced evidence of five additional convictions, including a 1994 conviction and prison sentence for driving while intoxicated and a 2000 conviction and prison sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. After convicting Parra-Telles and finding the State's enhancement allegations to be true, the trial court sentenced Parra-Telles as an habitual offender to thirty-five years of confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. Tex. Pen. Code. Ann. § 12.42 (d) (Vernon Supp. 2008).

On appeal, Parra-Telles's counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On October 23, 2008, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (2)

AFFIRMED.

____________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice



Submitted on February 11, 2009

Opinion Delivered February 25, 2009

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1. The judgment states the appellant's name is "Jose Luis Parra-Tellez" and that he is also known as "Jorge Bermeo-Telles."

2.Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.