in Re Caroline Durham and Barry Durham
in Re Caroline Durham and Barry Durham
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-09-00367-CV
In re Caroline Durham and Barry Durham
Original Proceeding
Order denying rehearing
Relators’ motion for rehearing is denied. See In re Brumbalow, 281 S.W.3d 718, 719 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009, orig. proceeding) (trial judge has reasonable time to perform ministerial duty of considering and ruling on motion properly filed and before judge, but that duty generally does not arise until movant has brought motion to trial judge’s attention, and mandamus will not lie unless movant makes that showing and trial judge then fails or refuses to rule within reasonable time).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Reyna, and
Justice Davis
(Chief Justice Gray concurs in the denial of the motion for rehearing but does not join in the apparent limitation thereon to the decision cited in the Court’s order. A separate opinion will not be issue.)
Motion for rehearing denied
Order issued and filed December 16, 2009
Do not publish
ess determinations.
The trial court shall conduct the hearing within fourteen (14) days after the date of this order. The trial court clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental records within twenty-eight (28) days after the date of this order.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Reyna, and
Justice Davis
Appeal abated
Order issued and filed December 15, 2010
Do not publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.