Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Stephen and Veronica Brady v. Carolyn Brady

Stephen and Veronica Brady v. Carolyn Brady
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 17, 2009

Stephen and Veronica Brady v. Carolyn Brady

Opinion

Opinion filed September 17, 2009

 

 

Opinion filed September 17, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        In The

                                                                             

    Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                 ____________

 

                                                          No. 11-09-00207-CV

                                                    __________

 

                        STEPHEN AND VERONICA BRADY, Appellants

 

                                                             V.

 

                                       CAROLYN BRADY, Appellee

 

 

                                  On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

 

                                                      McLennan County, Texas

 

                                            Trial Court Cause No. 20090535CV1

 

 

                                              M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

The clerk=s record was filed in this court on July 21, 2009.  It does not contain a final, appealable order.  In response to our inquiry, the clerk of the trial court advised this court in writing that a Awrit of possession@ was signed on June 16, 2009, that there were no copies of contests concerning appellants= affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal, that there had been no ruling on the motion to withdraw the writ of possession, and that there had been no subsequent documents filed relating to the attempted appeal.


On August 7, 2009, the clerk of this court wrote the parties advising them that a final, appealable order did not appear to have been entered and directing appellants to respond in writing on or before August 24, 2009, showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  There has been no response to our letter of August 7.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 

PER CURIAM

 

September 17, 2009

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.