Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Thomas Stauder II v. City of Lamesa

Thomas Stauder II v. City of Lamesa
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 2, 2009

Thomas Stauder II v. City of Lamesa

Opinion

Opinion filed July 2, 2009

 

 

Opinion filed July 2, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        In The

                                                                             

    Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                 ____________

 

                                                          No. 11-08-00322-CV

                                                    __________

 

                                    THOMAS STAUDER II, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                                  CITY OF LAMESA ET AL, Appellees

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 106th District Court

 

                                                        Dawson County, Texas

 

                                              Trial Court Cause No. 08-09-18002

 

 

                                             M E M O R A N D U M    O P I N I O N

The trial court granted the plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed the claims asserted by Thomas Stauder II.  We dismiss.


The trial court signed its order on December 3, 2008.  Stauder filed his pro se notice of appeal, and the clerk=s record was filed in this court on February 2, 2009.  Stauder=s brief was originally due to be filed in this court on April 9, 2009.  This court extended the due date for the brief to June 1. 2009.  In the letter advising parties of the June 1 due date, this court also informed the parties that failure by Stauder to file his brief by the June 1 due date could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution.  As of this date, Stauder has failed to file his brief in this court and has failed to contact this court in any manner regarding the appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

 

PER CURIAM

 

July 2, 2009

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.