Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Cheryl Preston v. Texas Health Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Deerings Nursing Home

Cheryl Preston v. Texas Health Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Deerings Nursing Home
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 26, 2009

Cheryl Preston v. Texas Health Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Deerings Nursing Home

Opinion

Opinion filed February 26, 2009

 

 

Opinion filed February 26, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        In The

                                                                             

    Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                 ____________

 

                                                          No. 11-09-00012-CV

                                                    __________

 

                                      CHERYL PRESTON, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                          TEXAS HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A

DEERINGS NURSING HOME, Appellee

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 244th District Court

 

                                                           Ector County, Texas

 

                                                Trial Court Cause No. C-102,500

 

 

                                             M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

The trial court signed the judgment on October 28, 2008.  A motion for new trial was not filed.  On January 6, 2009, Cheryl Preston filed a pro se notice of appeal.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.


The clerk of this court advised the parties that it appeared an appeal had not been timely perfected and directed Preston to respond showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Preston has filed several documents in response.  On February 11, 2009, Preston filed a motion to forgive the  tardiness of her appeal.

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before December 1, 2008.  To secure an extension of time to perfect the appeal, both the notice of appeal and a motion were due to be filed on or before December 16, 2008.  Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.  Preston=s notice of appeal was not filed until seventy days after the judgment was signed.  Her letters, motion, and other documents do not comply with the requirements of Verburght v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. 1997).  Therefore, Preston has failed to invoke the jurisdiction of this court.

The pro se motion is overruled, and the appeal is dismissed.

 

PER CURIAM

 

February 26, 2009

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.