Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc.

Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 21, 2009

Dion Rudkin v. Good Shepherd Medical Center, Inc.

Opinion

NO

NO. 12-09-00230-CV

 

                         IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

            TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

 

                                      TYLER, TEXAS

 

 

DION RUDKIN,                                                 '     APPEAL FROM THE 188TH

APPELLANT

 

V.                                                                         '     JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

 

GOOD SHEPHERD

MEDICAL CENTER, INC.,

APPELLEE                                                        '     GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed because Appellant has failed, after notice, to pay or make arrangements to pay the district clerk=s fee for preparing the clerk=s record.  Appellant appeals from a judgment signed on April 29, 2009.  On August 28, 2009, this court notified the district clerk and the court reporter that their respective records were due to have been filed by August 27, 2009, but had not yet been filed.  They were further informed that the court had extended the time to file their records or request an extension until September 28, 2009.  The district clerk responded that Appellant had not paid the required preparation fee.

On October 1, 2009, this court notified Appellant that the district clerk’s correspondence to this court stated that the reason for the delay in filing the clerk’s record was Appellant’s nonpayment of the required preparation fee.  Appellant was further informed that, pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.3(b) and 42.3(c), the appeal would be dismissed unless proof of full payment to the district clerk was provided on or before October 12, 2009.

Appellant has neither provided proof of full payment or otherwise responded to this court=s notice.  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissedSee Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered October 21, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(PUBLISH)

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.