Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Texas a & M University Corpus Christi v. John Secord

Texas a & M University Corpus Christi v. John Secord
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 29, 2009

Texas a & M University Corpus Christi v. John Secord

Opinion







NUMBER 13-09-00621-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

 

TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY CORPUS CHRISTI,                        Appellant,


v.


JOHN SECORD,                                                                            Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


          Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-61432-2. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement that renders this appeal moot. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

          The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

                                                                           PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

the 29th day of December, 2009.




 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.