Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co.

Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 20, 2009

Arminda Garza v. Arturo Garza and New Bern Transport Co.

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00226-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ ARMINDA GARZA, Appellant, v. ARTURO GARZA AND NEW BERN TRANSPORT CO., Appellees. ______________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-618-06-D. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have settled their dispute in controversy. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX .

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 20th day of August, 2009.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.