Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr. v. Frost National Bank

Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr. v. Frost National Bank
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided August 6, 2009

Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr. v. Frost National Bank

Opinion











NUMBERS 13-09-00412-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

UVALDO CANTU, JR. AND RUBEN M. TORRES, JR., Appellants,



v.



FROST NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben Torres, Jr., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2007-07-3680-G (Ed Carey Development, L.P., et. al. v. Frost National Bank appellate cause number 13-09-00081-CV). This cause is presently before the Court on an unopposed motion to partially dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr. Appellants, Uvaldo Cantu, Jr. and Ruben M. Torres, Jr., request that this Court dismiss their appeal because they have settled their portion of the case and no longer wish to pursue the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 6th day of August, 2009.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.