Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Henry Thompson A/K/A Henry Terrell v. State

Henry Thompson A/K/A Henry Terrell v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided June 4, 2009

Henry Thompson A/K/A Henry Terrell v. State

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00600-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

HENRY THOMPSON A/K/A HENRY TERRELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Henry Thompson a/k/a Henry Terrell, attempts to appeal his conviction theft. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On April 16, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On August 15, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel states that although the trial court certification incorrectly reflects that appellant had no right of appeal because it was a plea bargain case, appellant waived his right to appeal. Counsel’s response states that appellant does not have a right of appeal.

On April 8, 2009, the trial court held a hearing regarding the trial court certification of the defendant’s right to appeal. At that hearing, counsel stated that she sent appellant a copy of her letter dated August 15, 2008, setting forth the reasons appellant did not have the right to appeal, and she has received no response from appellant. Appellant was released from prison on December 12, 2008.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 4th day of June, 2009.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.