Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

in Re: Allied Chemical Corporation

in Re: Allied Chemical Corporation
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 31, 2009

in Re: Allied Chemical Corporation

Opinion













NUMBER 13-09-00160-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG



IN RE: ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, ET AL.



On Petition for Writ of Mandamus



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)



Relators, Allied Chemical Corporation, et al., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend that respondent, the Honorable Mario E. Ramirez Jr., presiding judge of the 332nd Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relators without an adequate appellate remedy, by rendering an "Order Compel[l]ing Plaintiffs and Intervenors to A[nsw]er Able Supply and Borg-Warner Interrogatories" in the underlying case on March 13, 2009.

This Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.



PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 31st day of March, 2009.

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.")

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.