Rosa Imelda Rivera, Eduardo Cavazos Montemayor, and Marcela Montemayor v. Pat L. Pace and Mary Joe Pace
Rosa Imelda Rivera, Eduardo Cavazos Montemayor, and Marcela Montemayor v. Pat L. Pace and Mary Joe Pace
Opinion
______________________________________________________________
ROSA IMELDA RIVERA, EDUARDO
CAVAZOS MONTEMAYOR, AND
MARCELA MONTEMAYOR, Appellants,
PAT L. PACE AND MARY JOE PACE, ET AL., Appellees.
_____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
This appeal was abated by this Court on June 3, 2004, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On February 5, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.
Appellants responded to the order by informing the Court that they no longer desire to prosecute their appeal and the case should be reinstated and dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this the 12th day of March, 2009.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.