in Re: Ismael Hernandez
in Re: Ismael Hernandez
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-08-00704-CR & 13-08-00705-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: ISMAEL HERNANDEZ
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Ismael Hernandez, pro se, filed petitions for writ of mandamus in the above causes on December 11, 2008. The Court requested and received a response filed by the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and through the District Attorney for Nueces County, Texas.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petitions for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to
See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). the relief sought. Accordingly, the petitions for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See TEX .
R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 28th day of January, 2009.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.