Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

River Ridge Nursing Center in Its Assumed or Common Name v. Gaylynne Nemec,...

River Ridge Nursing Center in Its Assumed or Common Name v. Gaylynne Nemec,...
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 15, 2009

River Ridge Nursing Center in Its Assumed or Common Name v. Gaylynne Nemec,...

Opinion











NUMBER 13-08-00540-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

RIVER RIDGE NURSING CENTER IN ITS

ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, ET AL., Appellants,



v.



GAYLYNNE NEMEC, INDIVIDUALLY,

AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE

OF CATHERINE PARKER, AS WRONGFUL

DEATH BENEFICIARY OF CATHERINE

PARKER, ET AL., Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, River Ridge Nursing Center in its assumed or common name, et. al., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-4563-F. Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that it no longer desires to prosecute their suit against appellees. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 15th day of January, 2009.









Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.