Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor

in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 30, 2009

in Re John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and A/N/F James Doe, a Minor

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed December 30, 2009.

 

 

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-09-01050-CV

____________

 

IN RE JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND

A/N/F OF JAMES DOE, Relators

 

 

 


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

 

 


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On December 15, 2009, relators John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually and As Next Friend of James Doe, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to vacate orders by the Honorable Larry Weiman, presiding judge of the 80th District Court of Harris County, dated November 7, 2009, and December 4, 2009, entered in trial court cause number 2008-49120, In the Interest of B.N.G., and to stay all proceedings. 

            Relators have not established they are entitled to mandamus relief.  Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.     

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and Sullivan.

Do Not Publish.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.