Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2009

Danny Lee Gonzales v. Crystal Cassandra Flores

Danny Lee Gonzales v. Crystal Cassandra Flores
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 26, 2009

Danny Lee Gonzales v. Crystal Cassandra Flores

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2009

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 26, 2009.

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-08-00991-CV

____________

 

DANNY LEE GONZALES, Appellant

 

V.

 

CRYSTAL CASSANDRA FLORES, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-49718

 

 

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

 

According to information provided to this Court, this is an attempted appeal from an order signed October 7, 2008, which denied appellant=s claim of indigency and request for an appointed attorney in his pending divorce action. 

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments.  Lehmann v. Har‑Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001).  Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if permitted by statute.  Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). 


There is no statute providing for an interlocutory appeal of the court's ruling on indigency for trial proceedings.  Lomax v. Thomas, No. 14‑08‑00163‑CV, 2008 WL 4308610, *1 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] Aug. 28, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.).  Thus, an order denying indigent status may not be appealed before entry of final judgment.  In contrast, a trial court=s indigency ruling pertaining to an already pending appeal is appealable. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737, 738‑39 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding).

On February 11, 2009, notification was transmitted to the parties of this court=s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  To date, no response has been filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.