TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00127-CV

Roland D. Fortenberry, Jr., a/k/a Dale Fortenberry, Jr. and Kaye Ann Fortenberry, Appellants v. Gerald R. Cavanaugh, Jr. and Dianna Cavanaugh, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 30599, HONORABLE PAUL DAVIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to terminate a receivership and granting the receiver’s application to extend the receivership. Appellees Gerald R. Cavanaugh, Jr. and Dianna Cavanaugh have filed a supplemental docketing statement with a jurisdictional statement. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.3. They contend that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the appeal is from an interlocutory order that is not a final judgment and the notice of appeal was not filed within 20 days after the interlocutory order was signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 28.1; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (judgment generally final for purposes of appeal “if it disposes of all pending parties and claims”).

Appellants Roland D. Fortenberry, Jr., a/k/a Dale Fortenberry, Jr. and Kaye Ann Fortenberry have filed a stipulation to appellees’ jurisdictional statement. Appellants agree that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

__________________________________________ Jan P. Patterson, Justice Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: August 12, 2010