in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State
in Re Arthur J. Woods v. State
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 9, 2010
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-10-00508-CR
In Re Arthur J. Woods, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 9, 2010, relator, Arthur J. Woods, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Mary Lou Keel, presiding judge of the 232nd District Court of Harris County, to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his motion for mistrial.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.[1] Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and related emergency motion to stay proceedings.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Brown, Sullivan, and Christopher.
Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[1] The mandamus record does not reflect that relator requested the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on his motion for mistrial.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.