in Re James Baxter, D.C.
in Re James Baxter, D.C.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00388-CV
____________
IN RE JAMES BAXTER, D.C., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 4, 2010, relator, James Baxter, D.C., pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.[1] In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to grant a mistrial and set aside the directed verdict on the plaintiffs’ claims.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Boyce.
[1] In the petition, relator states he is filing this petition on behalf of Protech Evaluation Services, Inc., Baxter Injury Centers, Sterling Imaging, and other plaintiff chiropractic offices.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.