Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

in Re: Roy Franklin Smith, Jr.

in Re: Roy Franklin Smith, Jr.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 20, 2010

in Re: Roy Franklin Smith, Jr.

Opinion

NO

NO. 12-10-00320-CR

 

                         IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

            TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

 

                                      TYLER, TEXAS

 

                                                                             '    

IN RE: FRANKLIN SMITH, JR.,

RELATOR                                                          '     ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

 

                                                                             '    

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

            In this original proceeding, Relator Roy Franklin Smith, Jr. seeks a writ of mandamus to compel compliance with various federal and state constitutional and statutory provisions.  As respondents, Relator names Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas; Micheal Jimerson, Henderson County District Attorney; Allison Ballard Biggs, “pro tem prosecutor”; and Thad W. Davidson, “attorney appointed.”

            A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction.  Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004).  In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus against any other officer or individual, a relator must show that the writ is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction.  See id.; In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding).  Relator has not shown that the issuance of a writ of mandamus against any of the respondents is necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction.  Consequently, we have no authority to issue the writ.  Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered October 20, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

 

 

 

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.