Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Billy Eldridge v. Stephanie Eldridge

Billy Eldridge v. Stephanie Eldridge
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 16, 2010

Billy Eldridge v. Stephanie Eldridge

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-10-00094-CV

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                        BILLY ELDRIDGE, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                    STEPHANIE ELDRIDGE, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

                                                             Fannin County, Texas

                                                       Trial Court No. PO-10-39692

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                        Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            Billy Eldridge has filed an appeal.  He is not indigent, but has not requested or paid (or made arrangements to pay) for a clerk’s record.  Thus, a clerk’s record has not been prepared or filed.  Eldridge has also not filed a reporter’s record in this appeal and has not paid the filing fee with this Court.  On October 18, 2010, we sent a letter to counsel pointing out that the record was thirty days overdue and that the fees had not been paid and warning that, if action was not taken within ten days to prosecute this appeal with effect, it would be subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

            Twenty days has now elapsed, and we have received no response. 

            We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

 

 

                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                        Chief Justice

 

Date Submitted:          November 15, 2010

Date Decided:             November 16, 2010

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.