Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 9, 2010

Carlos A. Armenta v. TDCJ

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-10-00011-CV ______________________________

IN RE: ENBRIDGE PIPELINES (EAST TEXAS) L.P.

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas) L.P., Relator, has filed a motion stating that it wishes to withdraw its petition for writ of mandamus. The relator represents to this Court that the parties have reached a “compromise and settlement agreement, resolving all issues presently pending before the Court.” In such a case, no real controversy exists, and in the absence of a controversy, the appeal is moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

Jack Carter Justice Date Submitted: March 8, 2010 Date Decided: March 9, 2010

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.