Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Robert Len Haas v. State of Texas

Robert Len Haas v. State of Texas
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 7, 2010

Robert Len Haas v. State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion filed January 7, 2010

 

 

Opinion filed January 7, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                        In The

                                                                             

    Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                 ____________

 

                                                          No. 11-09-00357-CR

                                                    __________

 

                                     ROBERT LEN HAAS, Appellant

 

                                                             V.

 

                                         STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 104th District Court

 

                                                          Taylor County, Texas

 

                                                  Trial Court Cause No. 16176-B

 

 

                                              M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On December 7, 2009, Robert Len Haas filed in this court a pro se notice of appeal.  In this document, Haas stated emphatically that he was appealing from the trial court=s decision concerning his request for Aany and all trial transcripts.@  The clerk of this court wrote the parties that the notice of appeal had been filed but that it appeared Haas was attempting to perfect an appeal in a situation where a final, appealable order had not yet been entered.  Haas was directed to respond showing grounds for continuing this appeal.


Haas filed in this court a response.  Haas again contends that he is appealing the trial court=s denial of his request for trial court transcriptions and records.  We understand that Haas=s desire is to secure copies of his records from trial court proceedings; however, Haas has not established that an appealable order has been entered or that this court has jurisdiction to consider a direct appeal in this situation.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 

PER CURIAM

 

January 7, 2010

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.