Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

George Leslie Sanders v. State

George Leslie Sanders v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 26, 2010

George Leslie Sanders v. State

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-09-00099-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                GEORGE LESLIE SANDERS, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court

                                                              Hunt County, Texas

                                                            Trial Court No. 25024

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            George Leslie Sanders appeals from his convictions on three charges of delivery of methamphetamine.  A jury assessed punishment at forty-nine years' imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Institutional Division.  Sanders filed a single brief with this Court, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals.[1]  Sanders argues he was denied due process by allegedly false misrepresentations made by the State’s witness with the goal of inflaming the jury.  He also alleges the trial court abused its discretion in denying motions for mistrial, and in allowing the State to question him about previous convictions used for enhancement during punishment. 

            We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Sanders’ appeal in cause number 06-09-00098-CR.  For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not been shown in this case.

            We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

 

 

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          February 24, 2010

Date Decided:             February 26, 2010

 

Do Not Publish



[1]Sanders appeals from three convictions for delivery of methamphetamine, cause numbers 06-09-00098-CR through 06-09-00100-CR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.