Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Linda Gale Hurley v. Lowell Cable, Mary Cable and Day Cable, D/B/A the Reilly Springs Land Company Partnership

Linda Gale Hurley v. Lowell Cable, Mary Cable and Day Cable, D/B/A the Reilly Springs Land Company Partnership
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 28, 2010

Linda Gale Hurley v. Lowell Cable, Mary Cable and Day Cable, D/B/A the Reilly Springs Land Company Partnership

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-09-00077-CV

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                    LINDA GALE HURLEY, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                  LOWELL CABLE, MARY CABLE, AND DAY CABLE,

D/B/A THE REILLY SPRINGS LAND COMPANY PARTNERSHIP, Appellees

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 62nd Judicial District Court

                                                           Hopkins County, Texas

                                                          Trial Court No. CV35867

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            Linda Gale Hurley, appellant, filed her notice of appeal August 18, 2009.

            The clerk’s record was filed September 18, 2009, and the reporter’s record was filed October 14, 2009.  Hurley’s brief was therefore due November 13, 2009.  When neither a brief nor a motion to extend time for filing the same had been filed by December 14, 2009, we contacted Hurley by letter and informed her that if a brief had not been filed by December 29, 2009, the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

            We have received no communication from Hurley.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

 



                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          January 27, 2010

Date Decided:             January 28, 2010

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.