Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson

Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided January 22, 2010

Henry Pearson v. Michael Pearson

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-09-00105-CV

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                                        HENRY PEARSON, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                       MICHAEL PEARSON, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                         On Appeal from the 5th Judicial District Court

                                                             Bowie County, Texas

                                                      Trial Court No. 09C0698-005

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            On December 17, 2009, we mailed a letter to appellant, who is representing himself, requesting that he show this Court how we had jurisdiction over this appeal regarding a potential defect in that the judgment does not appear to dispose of named defendants Pearson Realty Investments, L.L.C., or Porter-McClure Co., Inc., thereby depriving this Court of jurisdiction under Lehmann v. Harcon, 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001). 

            In that letter, we directed appellant to show this Court how we had jurisdiction and informed him that if no response was received by December 28, 2009, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is now January 21, 2010, and no response has been received.

            We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

 

 

 

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          January 21, 2010

Date Decided:             January 22, 2010

           

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.