Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. John T. Hannigan, C.R.N.A. and Fred L. Perez, M.D.
Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. John T. Hannigan, C.R.N.A. and Fred L. Perez, M.D.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00269-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________
PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
JOHN T. HANNIGAN, C.R.N.A. AND
FRED L. PEREZ, M.D., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 398th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on October 29, 2010. On November 9, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 16th
day of December, 2010.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.