Russell Wade Haney v. State
Russell Wade Haney v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-10-0057-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
MAY 28, 2010
______________________________
RUSSELL WADE HANEY,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE 46th DISTRICT COURT OF WILBARGER COUNTY;
NO. 11,333; HON. DAN MIKE BIRD, PRESIDING
_______________________________
Order
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Russell Wade Haney, appellant, appeals his conviction for possessing a controlled substance. His appeal was timely perfected on February 22, 2010. Furthermore, the clerk’s and reporter’s records were filed on March 23, 2010 and April 6, 2010, respectively. Thus, the appellant’s brief was due on April 26, 2010. On May 13, 2010, we notified appellant’s counsel by letter that the briefing deadline had lapsed without a brief being filed. We also directed him to file a brief or otherwise respond to our letter by May 24, 2010. To date, neither a brief, a motion to extend the briefing deadline, nor a response to our May 13th letter has been received.
Those convicted of criminal acts are entitled to effective assistance of counsel on appeal. The failure of counsel to timely prosecute an appeal falls short of rendering such assistance. To avoid the latter circumstance from occurring at bar, we hereby order appellant’s counsel, Thomas L. Allensworth, SBN 01077300, 813 8th Street, Suite 920, Wichita Falls, Texas 76301, to prepare and file a brief in this cause on behalf of his client, Russell Wade Haney, and in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mr. Allensworth is further ordered to file said brief with the clerk of this Court at 501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2-A, Amarillo, Texas, in a manner assuring that it will be received by said clerk at that address on or before 5:00 p.m. on June 4, 2010. The failure to so comply with this directive will result in his being directed to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.