Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

in Re: Carlos Espinoza

in Re: Carlos Espinoza
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 5, 2010

in Re: Carlos Espinoza

Opinion

Becker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS



IN RE



CARLOS ESPINOZA,



RELATOR

§

§

§

§

§



No. 08-10-00136-CV


An Original Proceeding


in Mandamus

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

            Relator, Carlos Espinoza, asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable Yahara Gutierrez, Judge of the 65th District Court of El Paso County. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relator is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Further, we deny Relator’s motion to stay trial court proceedings. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.10.



May 5, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice


Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.