Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

in Re: Samuel Fertic

in Re: Samuel Fertic
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 17, 2010

in Re: Samuel Fertic

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS




IN RE: SAMUEL FERTIC,



                           Relator.

 

§

§

§

§




No. 08-10-00066-CR


AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

                        IN MANDAMUS

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS


            Samuel Fertic, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting this Court compel the Judge the 41st Judicial District Court of El Paso Count, Texas to send “Clarification Order’s” [sic] to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, stating that Relator did not cause the death of an individual in the commission of the offense for which he is now imprisoned.

            In order to obtain relief through a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other adequate remedy at law is available and (2) that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals At Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Based on the petition and record provided, Relator has not demonstrated he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8. We therefore deny the petition.

 

March 17, 2010                                                          

                                                                                    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice


Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.


(Do Not Publish)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.