Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

in Re: Joey Hernandez

in Re: Joey Hernandez
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 10, 2010

in Re: Joey Hernandez

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS






IN RE: JOEY HERNANDEZ,


Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

 §




No. 08-10-00043-CR

 

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


IN MANDAMUS



 

 

 


MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS


            Joey Hernandez, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting this Court to compel the Judge of the 168th Judicial District Court of El Paso Count, Texas to “adjudicate” numerous motions, letters, pleadings, and exhibits and apply 2,054 days of “time served credit” to Relator’s sentence of imprisonment.

            In order to obtain relief through a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other adequate remedy at law is available; and (2) that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals At Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Based on the petition and record provided, Relator has not demonstrated he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8. We therefore deny the petition.




March 10, 2010

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice


Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)


(Do Not Publish)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.