Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht

Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided October 7, 2010

Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez and Bravo Steel Products, Inc. v. Abraham Baksht

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00454-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

RON ST. JOHN, SENOVIO RAMIREZ AND

BRAVO STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.,                                          Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

ABRAHAM BAKSHT,                                                                     Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                           On appeal from the 370th District Court

                                       of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                     Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, Ron St. John, Senovio Ramirez, and Bravo Steel Products, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-4725-99-G.  Appellants have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal on grounds that appellants no longer desire to pursue their appeal.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion for voluntary dismissal of their appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

7th day of October, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.