Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Pagel Davis & Hill P. C. v. McALLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Pagel Davis & Hill P. C. v. McALLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 30, 2010

Pagel Davis & Hill P. C. v. McALLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00458-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

PAGEL DAVIS & HILL, P.C.,                                                       Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

McALLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC.,                                              Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                     On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                                       of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                     Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, Pagel Davis & Hill, P.C., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-06-3135-B.  The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss on grounds the parties have agreed to modify the trial court’s order.  The parties request that this Court dismiss this case. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

30th day of September, 2010.      

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.