Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Jody Shannon, Individually v. Paccar Financial Corp.

Jody Shannon, Individually v. Paccar Financial Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 30, 2010

Jody Shannon, Individually v. Paccar Financial Corp.

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00358-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

JODY SHANNON, INDIVIDUALLY                                       APPELLANT,

 

                                                             v.

 

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.,                                                   APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

 

                            On appeal from the 25th District Court

                                     of Gonzales County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

              Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, Jody Shannon, Individually, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas, in cause number 23,896.  The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss on grounds that the parties have entered into a compromise settlement agreement resolving their differences.  The parties request that this Court dismiss this case. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

30th day of September, 2010.      

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.