Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

South Texas College v. Curtis Roberson

South Texas College v. Curtis Roberson
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 29, 2010

South Texas College v. Curtis Roberson

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00286-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE,                                                                   Appellant,

 

                                                             v.                               

 

CURTIS ROBERSON,                                                                            Appellee.

 

____________________________________________________________

 

                          On Appeal from the 139th District Court 

                                       of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellant, South Texas College, attempts to appeal an order denying a plea to the jurisdiction entered against it on May 17, 2010.  Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for involuntary dismissal on grounds that the Court should dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Accordingly, the appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the  

29th day of July, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.