Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Leonard Simmons, Anita Simmons Boswell, Cecil R. Simmons and Michael Scott v. Robert Dunkin

Leonard Simmons, Anita Simmons Boswell, Cecil R. Simmons and Michael Scott v. Robert Dunkin
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 15, 2010

Leonard Simmons, Anita Simmons Boswell, Cecil R. Simmons and Michael Scott v. Robert Dunkin

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00272-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

LEONARD SIMMONS, ANITA SIMMONS BOSWELL,

CECIL R. SIMMONS, AND MICHAEL SCOTT,                       Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

ROBERT DUNKIN,                                                                          Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                           On appeal from the 103rd District Court

                                      of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

                      Before Justices Yañez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, Leonard Simmons, Anita Simmons Boswell, Cecil R. Simmons, and Michael Scott, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2009-02-1190-D.  The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the controversy made the basis of this cause has been settlement by agreement between the parties.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal and tax costs against the party or parties by whom such costs were incurred. 

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the  

15th day of July, 2010.      

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.