Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2010

Ramiro Baltazar, Susie Baltazar and/or All Occupants 3114 Sonoma Drive, Corpus...

Ramiro Baltazar, Susie Baltazar and/or All Occupants 3114 Sonoma Drive, Corpus...
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 27, 2010

Ramiro Baltazar, Susie Baltazar and/or All Occupants 3114 Sonoma Drive, Corpus...

Opinion

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00546-CV

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

RAMIRO BALTAZAR, SUSIE BALTAZAR

AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS 3114 SONOMA DRIVE,

CORPUS CHRSTI, TX 78414,                                                     Appellants,

 

                                                             v.

 

THE BANK OF NEW TRUST COMPANY N.A.

AS SUCESSOR TO JPMORGAN CHASE

BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE,                                                               Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

                      On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

                                        of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

              Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 


Appellants, Ramiro Baltazar and Susie Baltazar, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 09-60307-5.  Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the matter at issue has been resolved.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants= motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

27th day of May, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.